Unsubstantiated and rash is the proposal of the Ministry of Education to introduce a state exam in higher education professors comment. The vast majority of students rejected the proposal of Ministry of Education for external p9 testing of the faculties. Minister Abdulakim Ademi announced he would not say the professors, but they wonder who is smarter than university professors and will verify p9 the knowledge odnosno exams at universities
Promotion of the manual "Research based on an existing story-Manual for investigative journalists" - 20/12/2014 self-regulation of the media sphere p9 - Challenges and expectations - 12/20/2014 CITIZENS COURT discouraged to fight for justice - 12/11/2014
No reactions subside academic input that proposal MES for external testing of the faculties, which are to be implemented in the second and fourth year of studies, is illegal and unconstitutional. While MES convinces the public that the external faculty is just an idea, which is yet to be debated by students and professors in public out a letter that is already agreed p9 Danish model.
NGO OIF analyzed and targeted all the weaknesses of this proposal starting against constitutional law against that contradict p9 ECTS until the financial damages that will suffer the students. Competent came with the promise that the proposed solution will endanger Bologne system, nor will damage the autonomy of faculty.
"I do not know who is smarter than university professors and will verify the knowledge odnosno exams at the university. For example, the subject Roman law of all 22 law faculties with dispersed throughout Macedonia, only Law Faculty has Roman law, so the question is who will evaluate students p9 on this subject when we here have two teachers. Who will be the quantum of the issues and who he Examination center p9 will verify the knowledge of students who come to the fourth year, "asks Dean of the Faculty of Ss, Verga Davitkovski.
Associate Dean of the Faculty of Political Science and International Relations at FON University - Skopje, Nazmi Maliqi in Inboks7 p9 statement, says that this process is very shortsighted, because I still do not know the results of the external secondary education, and will bring in higher education.
"External not a big benefit for improvement in the quality of education. This process is very shortsighted, "said Maliki who explains that the European model of education should be an example for Macedonia.
"The educational process in the EU are monitored continuously as the control and direction p9 of students from primary to secondary education. Hence the educational system needs to have continuity and to not clutter the number of students in only one direction. At the same time we have empty schools. MES should therefore be concerned. p9 What does it state exam faculty needed information from MES and what it means for the independence of the university? p9 "Asks Maliki.
He maintains that university professors no one to test, since this violates many rights guaranteed. This would not sit down to talk, Maliki said, adding that the Ministry of Education may conduct another control system knowledge as evaluations and now there.
"I have a proposal in the internal evaluacija- would accept students not to take the same professor who hear the exam, they simply will not know the professor when they come to the exam ..." suggests the university professor.
Dean of the Faculty of Ss, Verga Davitkovski also rejected this proposal MES as completely not feasible, because there is no system of internal and external evaluation, which is not contrary to the constitutionally guaranteed autonomy of the university.
"In my opinion p9 it is illegal and unconstitutional if taken into account that the existing Law on Higher Education under which it can perform external examination of knowledge of existing students. Namely, there is a Board for Accreditation and Evaluation, formerly two different bodies now one where members 21 university professors p9 from all public and private universities that evaluate our programs or accredit. They also have the duty of every three years to evaluate. May at any time to come to check and see if and how we conduct examinations to check the knowledge of students, etc. The second way, which is also in accordance with the law, we are required to do internal evaluation. We at the Law Faculty each semester do evaluation because each semester according to Bologna all courses p9 semester. So the results of that assessment of students as us evaluate our administration posting on our website.
No comments:
Post a Comment