Welcome to the discussion forum FEE! This forum is intended for all members of the academic community and the public FEL, especially for graduates and prospective students on the FEL. Ask the Academic Senate, educators, guidance, your colleagues what you want! Forum established AS FEL to raise awareness and promote plankton discussion of the academic community.
Yesterday I was surprised to find that at least some of doctoral students on publications FEL FEL does not at all. I thought it was quite incomprehensible, so I suggested plankton that ORO in which we operate, plankton forcing students to write FEE THAT will be evaluated to assess student publications only for FEL. It does not limit you to publish in your spare time for whom she will work published outside FEL will not be considered for evaluation. plankton Even more surprising to me was that the proposal plankton was either labeled plankton as immoral and stocks referred upstairs at the right, or in a milder version of a safety plankton concern. The argument in the second case was that when u nas student only studies, but the work done elsewhere, so there would our affiliation should not be.
I do not see why we train PhD when their work has nothing to do with the FEL. Doctoral studies or degenerates into more or less a commercial thing - PhD student at us passing an examination plankton given the title and we get paid. Otherwise they have nothing in common. Nevidim then no differences in our PhD study and the offices of granting a license. I pass the exam and get the paper.
I do not see why we train PhD when their work has nothing to do with the FEL. Doctoral studies or degenerates into more or less a commercial thing - PhD student at us passing an examination plankton given the title and we get paid. Otherwise they have nothing in common. Nevidim then no differences in our PhD study and the offices of granting a license. I pass the exam and get the paper.
In our ORO I encountered this phenomenon, but I fully support plankton your opinion and request at least one publication with affiliates at CTU. Another bizarre situation could thus occur when the doctoral level student board, which already IF publication has since had another workplace, ie. min requirement for submission plankton of the thesis, leaving aside the study block, has been "fulfilled" and therefore "can only have scheduling". Affiliates to the workplace where there is the thesis should be a matter of course, follows from the Faculty unfortunately comes up empty. Multiple affiliates is a standard solution ... I will try to discuss with others the chairperson of the BBB within the next hearing ORP.
Advisor correct affiliation had, but it was not the FEL (or CTU). Unfortunately, this is probably often enough - trainers can be any man outside FEL, who meets the conditions and the approval ORO (and probably VR). Then it is situce when the FEL are created Doctors who with faculty actually has nothing to do and the administrative plankton tasks mentioned above. plankton Institutes Nor is the FEL, but different.
I only dared to oppose Mr associate professor e-mail within ORO. It was just the opinion of one of the twelve members of the Branch Board, in addition unrefined discussions. Within a few hours before he could talk to help someone plankton else, Mr. docent of correspondence within ORO forwarded to two members of management. More precisely one, the second address bit confused, so the addressee about rolled his eyes.
So, what is the problem described is not capturing its essence. Above all, it was a student in the combined form. Additionally, selected inappropriate example, it was not another university faculty, but the Academy of Sciences, which trained three PhD faculty of two universities.
I only dared to oppose Mr associate professor e-mail within plankton ORO. It was just the opinion of one of the twelve members of the Branch Board, in addition unrefined discussions. Within a few hours before he could talk to help someone else, Mr. docent of correspondence within ORO forwarded plankton to two members of management.
For me, the fact that our student audience by another institution plankton and not for FEL, unthinkable and schools damaging. I asked because people because their job is to control doctoral studies, what is the position of FEL in this situation (I thought that one of the offenses). It was nothing secret or public - AS CTU senator and head of department of physics FEL Dr. Kříha was also the addressee. Exactly the same way you react when you find that the faculty Deji other things that deplete it - inform plankton those who have a thing to worry about.
So I opened the debate on this thread. I have not written to the student who ORO finding because it is obviously irrelevant. The problem is general and does not know whether the singularity plankton or the expanded state. Did I mention the opposite opinion than they occupy me, because you can not discuss the case that they all have the same opinions. I had had reason to believe that you all say it's so clear and no one will be useless to express. I did not mention who held the opposite view, because it is again irrelevant.
The aim of this debate plankton will hopefully clear statements of the faculty. plankton Bud stude
